Today’s episode of Research Like a Pro is about Diana’s research log and report from the Shults project. She discusses her Family History Library research trip, how she logged her results, and her findings. We also discuss how she selected DNA matches to help verify the connection between Hickman Monroe Shults and his proposed father, Martin Shults.
Transcript
Nicole (1s):
This is Research Like a Pro episode 206, proving a parent child’s link using ancestry through lines. Part three. Welcome to Research Like a Pro a Genealogy Podcast about taking your research to the next level, hosted by Nicole Dyer and Diana Elder accredited genealogy professional. Diana and Nicole are the mother-daughter team at FamilyLocket.com and the authors of Research Like a Pro A Genealogist Guide. With Robin Wirthlin they also co-authored the companion volume, Research Like a Pro with DNA. Join Diana and Nicole as they discuss how to stay organized, make progress in their research and solve difficult cases.
Nicole (43s):
Let’s go. Hello. Welcome to Research Like a Pro. Hi mom.
Diana (49s):
Hi Nicole. How are you today?
Nicole (51s):
I’m doing great. How’s your research and reading coming along?
Diana (55s):
Well, I have been reading in that national genealogical society magazine and their whole issue is on probate research. And this is the issue for April to June, 2022. So it’s been interesting reading about things like new England probate and African-Americans in the probate records and all sorts of different avenues of thinking about probate. You know, we work a lot with probate, but there’s always new little bits and pieces that we can learn. And that’s why I continue to study. I love it.
Nicole (1m 28s):
It’s such a helpful resource too, for finding those family members who you haven’t identified yet. A lot of the time the people buying from the estate or the witnesses of the will, or are going to be relatives like sons-in-law or something.
Diana (1m 43s):
I think one of the things to really remember about probate is to check out all of the records. We often like to just look at the will, but we want to look at the inventories and the estate sale, just every little scrap of paper and every person in there can give us so much information on our family. We often just don’t know how to use that. And so the more we researched and learned the better we get at using all those little bits and pieces in the probate records.
Nicole (2m 11s):
Yeah, well, I was reading Nancy Peter’s article from the December, 2021 and GSQ national genealogical society, quarterly and her article about A Father for William E. Enfinger of Alachua county, Florida was really heavily based on friends and associates and neighbors, the fan club, and trying to identify this person. I really liked her use of deeds. And it was interesting to see, you know, different kinds of land records that were used. And also it was such a good example of reasonably exhaustive research because she did a lot of page by page searches that she noted in the footnotes. You know, this whole section of whatever county book was searched for William and vigor or whoever.
Nicole (2m 56s):
And sometimes it’s just an amazing to see what be found that way. The guy that she was researching was a witness to a deed and witnesses to deeds are not index. So you really do have to read the whole book to find that
Diana (3m 8s):
Right, those deeds are amazing and they contain so much information, but you do have to really do your due diligence in doing the research and trying to find everybody mentioned. And if your ancestor didn’t leave a deed off and he was a witness for a deed, and I have seen a lot of those witnesses in the indexes as well. So it’s always great to just dig through those deeds and see what you can find in the county of interest, especially among all of your associates that your ancestor could have been living next to, or they could even be family members. And that was a really great article. I been reading that also the end fingers of a lot to a county and this gentleman shows up seemingly just by himself.
Diana (3m 53s):
But what Nancy was able to prove was this whole cluster of people around him and how they were all related. And they all were going back to the same county in South Carolina, where she found a probable father for him to. So we talk a lot about this idea of the fan club and cluster research, but this article really did point that out. Super interesting.
Nicole (4m 18s):
Yeah. Migration is so challenging. All right, well, our announcements for today are just that our study group is happening this fall Research Like a Pro. So we’d love to have you join us. And we’d love to have some peer group leaders apply. If you want to have free registration.
Diana (4m 32s):
I’m always really excited to do the study groups because I do my own projects and I’m already thinking about what I want to do. And I’m thinking I want to do something that’s maybe foundational for the DNA project I’ll do in the spring. So for anyone who’s interested, you could also do that, you know, do your documentary research in the fall study group and then add DNA to it in the spring, which is what I am planning on doing, because that can be really, really helpful.
Nicole (4m 59s):
And I’m restraining myself from doing a project because I know I should work on my portfolio. Now that I’m on the clock, I’m really trying to do everything I can to work on it. So I guess I shouldn’t do a project for the study group that other people can read a review because as you know, nothing can be reviewed for the portfolio, which kind of hard. I kind of want to just talk about the research with people and get their ideas, but it has to be my own work all by myself.
Diana (5m 26s):
Well, I will look forward to reading the entire portfolio when you are finished and you’ve turned it in and you can have people look at it,
Nicole (5m 33s):
Right. As soon as I turned it in, then I can show you what I did Sunday. All right. So today we are talking about your research with less study group. This is part three.
Diana (5m 44s):
Yes. We are going to talk about research logs and following the plan and what I found in my research and then writing it up.
Nicole (5m 53s):
Cool. So this will be a fun episode. So it is kind of a lot of work to write up the whole research report. After you’ve done research for 14 weeks on the same thing, we found a lot of discoveries and connections. And then now you have to like condense that all into a written report and that can take hours. It is really useful though, because it helps you remember what you did. And then at the end you can put all the list of things you didn’t get to do yet into your future research suggestions so that, you know, the starting point, the next time you work on this. So your project has been to work on this parent-child link and the Schultz ancestral line. And just kind of proving that with DNA evidence and reviewing the documentary evidence to see, you know, what is there out there about this parent child link and other people have done the research, but as far as we know, no one has written a report about it.
Nicole (6m 45s):
So you kind of have to regather at all. In the first part, we talked about the clustering that you did for Lucretia with the leads method and making a diagram of the close matches of the Schultz side of the family. It’s kind of starting that foundation. And then the timeline analyzing the sources, analyzing the DNA matches. Then in part two, we talked about locality research and ethnicity and DNA tools and the research plan. So now we’ll talk about your research log.
Diana (7m 13s):
All right. So let me just read through my research objective. So everybody remembers what I am doing in this project. Using DNA analysis and documentary research test. The hypothesis that Martin S Schultz was the biological father of Hickman Monro Schultz. Martin was born about 1800 and severe county Tennessee and died in 1854 in Johnson county, Texas. He married Sarah T routing on 24, December 18, 14 Rhea county, Tennessee Hickman was born on 13, June, 1821 in Alabama and died on 12 may, 1899 and falls county, Texas. He married Rachel Cox on four July, 1848 in Navarro county, Texas.
Diana (7m 55s):
So as you mentioned, I had my research plan created and I was set to tackle the records of Bibb county, Alabama. And because I live near salt lake city, I planned a trip to the family history library and use the excellent selection of books. They are to learn more about my Shults family early Alabama. So I was really excited to pull some books off the shelf that were abstracts of the court records. So this author source on ancestry had stated that Martin Schultz was listed on a big county Alabama jury in February 18, 19 with Kinison Schultz, Martin Haggard and nosh Haggard. And I was really hoping that this abstract by Martin Evers, a big county court records could show that entry because it would save me so much time in the research.
Diana (8m 46s):
And I also wanted to check some county histories that were available at the library. So when I go to a repository, having a research plan is so great because otherwise you walk in and it can seem so overwhelming, but because I had printed out my research plan, I had the call numbers. I knew exactly what I was looking for. I had my objective there. I didn’t have to try to remember what I was trying to do. I get distracted by all those wonderful books at the family history library. I knew exactly what I wanted to find, and I’ve also learned to take a flash drive so that I can scan whatever I find and have that on my flash drive. And I’ve learned by experience to always scan the title page and front matter of any book because the author compiler often will give important information about the record collection.
Diana (9m 35s):
They have studied this so much. They really can give you the good background and often they’ll use abbreviations there or they’ll add historical context. So I make sure I scan all of that. And then I also scan the index page for my family so that I can make sure I have every page that they’re mentioned. And I know I’ve made a comprehensive record of them in that book. So that’s kind of my working process when I go on a trip. So I take my printed research plan. I take a research notebook and pencil so that I can take any notes there. And I don’t, I take my laptop sometimes, but I go home to record everything I found in air table.
Diana (10m 19s):
I only had a couple of hours. They wanted to quickly get the information, get it scanned, make my notes, and then I would go home and really dive into it and get everything completely into air table and get it analyzed, get the citations all created. I wanted to make sure I had information for citations scanned, which is why I always do that front page. So I have the right information for a citation. So it was really great to have kind of a plan, know how to work, the family history library.
Nicole (10m 52s):
So you’re talking about books of like county court records, taxes, that kind of thing that someone has transcribed or abstracted. And so you’re just kind of doing an overview of what’s already been abstracted from that county,
Diana (11m 5s):
Right? I like to just look in the books that I have in my plan. And sometimes something else will catch my eye on the shelf that I maybe didn’t see in the catalog. And I will quickly look at that and jot down some notes that may be yes or no. There was the family, if yes, scan it, if no, make a note so that I can put that in my log as well. But yes, those books are so great. They are real time savers because someone else has gone through all their records and done an abstract and they say the page number and such, and then you can go try to find the original for that. And so I’d love to start with the published abstracts.
Diana (11m 45s):
If I can find those for a county deeds, marriages, probate tax records, all of those kinds records often will have abstracts.
Nicole (11m 56s):
Well, that’s great. So you had a plan, you got the books, you scanned everything, then what did you do? Did you add that to our table right there in the library? Did you do it at home? How’d you do that?
Diana (12m 6s):
No. As I mentioned, I decided to go home and the reason is I like to really read through the record thoroughly and add notes and that just takes time. And if you are a little short on time at the repository, I feel like that’s something that I can do once I’m home. So I do just try to streamline my time at the library
Nicole (12m 31s):
Way. Cool. So can you tell us a little bit more about what you found about the Schultz men in Bibb county?
Diana (12m 37s):
Yes. I found such good information. I did find several Schultz men in those big county court records. So after I entered the records into my air table log, I grouped the log by person. So I had a mini research log for each man. So my headaches were the air table research slog are the following. I have a short description such as court record for Martin Schultz, and then the person, the role, the date, the website repository, the URL, locality source, citation, results, fans, comments, and next steps and attachments. So I was able to get those all entered in once I got home and as I’m entering the information, I linked to the family search catalog page for the book.
Diana (13m 27s):
And then if I need to review that for my source citation, I have the link right there. And because I was using, you know, the same book for several entries, I just created a basic source citation, then copied and pasted it into each cell and change the specific page number. And then I abstracted the record into the results column. So the log entries reveal Martins residents in Bibb county from at least 1819 to 1823. Just what I had hoped. He was drawn as a juror for the superior court in 1819. And then he was next mentioned being issued a license to keep a Tavern and retail spiritualist liquors. And then his final entry was an 1823 where he was to be paid $1 for guarding a criminal, which was really interesting because also on that page where several other men who also got paid a dollar for guarding a criminal.
Diana (14m 19s):
So that seemed to be a theme it’s always fun. When you read these court records, you get a real snapshot into what it was like in that area. So this was the documentary evidence I had hoped to find Martin’s actions in the court records place them in the right time and place to verify that 1821 birth of Hickman Monro Schultz and Bibb county Alabama. So it was really wonderful to find that I also entered negative searches in the air table log under the broad person heading of Schultz. So there were some books that just didn’t have anything for my family. And I certainly do not want to repeat any searches at the library for this specific objective.
Diana (15m 2s):
So I just do a complete source citation and I put in my notes, you know, no Schultz family noted in this record book.
Nicole (15m 13s):
So you just basically found his residence there, you verified that and everything seemed to good to go.
Diana (15m 19s):
Right? I felt like that pretty well proved my objective right there that Hickman could have been born in Bibb county in 1821 because that’s where his father was living. But he also said in all the census records of his life, that he was born in Alabama and they all agreed with that 1821 birth, there was nothing different at all. So that seemed to make sense
Nicole (15m 39s):
How great.
Diana (15m 40s):
So as you mentioned, we do have that field for the fans, the friends, associates and neighbors in air table. So as I completed each entry in the research slug, I would add any fans to that field. And then that’s linked to another table called fans where everyone from both my timeline and my research log appears. And then I can start looking for patterns among the associates of Martin and Hickman Schultz. And already I knew that there would be some associates of the Hoggard family because there’s sister and daughter married a Hoggard man. And so, you know, I saw those names appearing and it’s always fun just to track them.
Diana (16m 22s):
I love the fans capability of air table,
Nicole (16m 26s):
Anybody who wants to use my air table template for a project like this, make sure you go to air table universe, and you can type in the title of this base that Diane is using. It’s RLP with DNA 2022 research log, or you can type in my name and click on my picture and go to my profile page. Then you can see all of the different templates that I have, but that’s the most recent one. And so whenever I add or change something that I publish a new template so that you can get the new one. All right. So what about the DNA research? How did you log that?
Diana (16m 57s):
So for the DNA portion of the research, I created a focus group of DNA matches for my key test taker Lucretia, and I identified the seven best matches from her ancestry DNA through lines for Martin Schultz by using list view, instead of the default relationship view, this was such a revelation. When I figured out how to do this on list view, I selected a best match from each of Martin Schulz’s children based on the highest amount of shared DNA. And the match has ranged from 16 cMs to 48 cMs. I entered each best match into the DNA match details field of air table.
Diana (17m 37s):
Then I diagrammed their connection, Alyssa chart, then check the relationship probability with the shared center Morgan project. So I had a little process. I was falling for each one of those best matches and they took a little bit longer than you might think, get all that done. Because then as I created the diagram, I use my ancestry tree to quickly build the descendency down from each of Hickman’s siblings and verify the links. Now it was really nice because through lines had suggested the relationships so I could use the associated trees to get clues if necessary. And sometimes there would be a really good tree that would have some good records and that I could quickly find it add to my tree. And so the blog post has my diagram, which shows my DNA tester and the anonymized DNA matches and their connections to Martin Schultz.
Diana (18m 24s):
But I would return back to that diagram over and over. So helpful to have your own diagram written out or drawn out. And the neat thing was it also revealed to DNA matches who are one generation closer to Lucretia, who I could ask to share their DNA results with me. I thought she was the best match I had turns out there’s a couple of, or even a generation closer. And then I also created the matrix to see if other Schultz test takers also shared DNA. So it was really fun to tackle the DNA part and look at the records and draw my diagram. You know, I always enjoy doing that step.
Nicole (19m 6s):
Yay. It’s so great when you find those long generation times so that they have more DNA from the more distant ancestors.
Diana (19m 14s):
So when I was doing the matrix, I found that there were some of the test takers who shared with each other and some with Lucretia, but not everybody shared with everybody. And I think that’s because we were working with smaller cMs. And so, you know, I had taken Lucretia’s best matches, but those probably were not the best matches of, you know, a couple of my other test takers. So, you know, it was an interesting experiment to try doing it that way, but I really need to expand that matrix.
Nicole (19m 55s):
Yeah. You really start to notice that when you have a lot of base test test-takers and they all descend in different ways from your research subject, I have noticed one line of the dire descendancy that I worked on really inherited a lot of the Tharp DNA in my brushy with our project. And so they were sharing a lot higher with some of the dark descendants than the others. And then there’s one of my test takers who just shares absolutely no DNA with any of the Thorpe descendants at all. She just, that ancestor is like not in her genetic family tree at all. Now that you have done that if you were going to go back and choose matches again, would you try to find ones that match more than one of your test takers rather than choosing like the one that I shared the most Sena Morgan’s with Lucretia?
Diana (20m 40s):
Well, I did like you seeing the list view and the largest matches. I think to add to that, I would take the best matches of all my test takers and compare with everybody else. So, you know, that would give me best matches from five people, seven different lines. I don’t know that would be something like 30 best matches to compare. And that would probably be it a really nice coverage perhaps of the DNA.
Nicole (21m 9s):
Absolutely. Yeah. It’s really good to think about these steps that we take as we select matches because you know, after doing a lot of DNA projects, we kind of just do it automatically and we know what we’re doing. And we look at the shared matches. We make sure they’re in the same networks, but probably some people out there listening. Aren’t really sure how to choose, which matches to include. And so it’s kind of interesting to hear how you did it. Well, how many children, like how many matches did you have? Six.
Diana (21m 36s):
Yeah, I was using the best match from each of the siblings of Hickman Monroe. So there were six.
Nicole (21m 44s):
Got it. Cool. So you chose six matches who descend from six different siblings of Hickman. Very good.
Diana (21m 55s):
Cool. Lucretia has 151 shared matches on her Martin Schultz through line.
Nicole (22m 0s):
Pretty awesome that you had so many matches to choose from. And how far back was it for Lucretia? Was this her second great grandparents?
Diana (22m 8s):
He is her third. Great-grandfather my fourth. Great-grandfather
Nicole (22m 14s):
After you made this matrix and you had all your DNA evidence ready to go, how did you decide, you know, how to show all of the research in your report? Did you have an idea of, you know, documentary first DNA second are weaving it all together?
Diana (22m 30s):
Well, for the report, I had a few things that I wanted to do. And the first thing was to obviously put together the various pieces of the puzzle that I’d been figuring out. And in the study group, we encourage everyone to begin writing from the very beginning. So I had already had my objective written out my limitations, the genealogical background information and the DNA background information. So it was nice because I already had that in place and that’s your foundation. But then I also wanted to put in that timeline information. So I sometimes see that as a table, but in this case, I decided to write a narrative because I’d never really written a narrative of all their basic facts.
Diana (23m 20s):
And so I wrote it out, out of the citations that was all easy to find right there on my timeline of air table. And then I added some maps, some snippets of documents, historical context for each individual’s life in Texas and Arkansas. And so that was a really fun, and that was actually kind of a lengthy section because there was quite a bit, I had previously found on them, but I wanted to get it this report. And then I discussed the Alabama research findings. So basically I’d done a little bit of DNA at the beginning with the background, you know, talking about my base test taker, Lucretia, and showing the diagram of how she connected and, and the other test takers.
Diana (24m 2s):
But then I went straight back to documentary after that. So after doing all the documentary evidence from the Alabama findings, then I went to DNA. So I didn’t really this report weave back and forth much. I basically did documentary than DNA. And I concluded that the document tree and DNA evidence confirmed my hypothesis that Martin Schultz was indeed the father of Hickman Monroe Schultz, which was great. So here’s what I wrote for my conclusion. This project successfully confirmed Martin Schultz as the father of Hickman Monroe Schultz through documentary evidence and evaluating DNA matches the research found Martin Schultz residing in Bibb county, Alabama in the early 1820s, when Hickman was born the 1830 and 1840 census enumeration for Martin Schultz revealed his migration from Alabama to new Madrid county, Missouri then to Polaski county, Arkansas.
Diana (24m 58s):
Those censuses contained placeholders for a male born about 1821. That would be Hickman Monro Schultz. Additionally Hickman and heirs of Martin Schulz received Texas land patents under the Mercer colony, likely migrating at or near the same time between 1840 and 1847 DNA matches to Hickman’s third great-granddaughter through each of his proposed siblings provide evidence of a genetic connection to Martin Schultz and Sarah Bowden identifying and verifying additional DNA matches constraint than the genetic evidence.
Nicole (25m 31s):
Nice. Yeah. I’m looking at your report right now and I love how you have the census data in there, and you have the lists of different people who were listed in various like court and whatever the land records and things, and you have some quotes from different books. Like you have a lot of really great data in here, some transcriptions, and then you talk about them. I like how on this one page, you have all the Schultz family and their ages and whether or not they were attending school and where they were born. It’s just nice to see those abstracts from the census.
Nicole (26m 12s):
And then you even have some snips of images. Like I like this figure number eight, where you have the Mercer colonist certificate for heirs of Martin Schultz. That’s really cool.
Diana (26m 22s):
Yes. I really like to put in some snippets of documents because I think it breaks it up for the client and helps them to see a visual, especially if it’s an important document and the heirs of Martin Schultz was an important document because it’s listing out their names. So, you know, that one was fun to put in there.
Nicole (26m 39s):
Yeah. And then if you’re doing client work, it’s really important to do that for the client. So they don’t have to go and repeat the work and like try to look at the census. They can just read it all there in the report. So what future research suggestions did you come up with?
Diana (26m 55s):
So for future research, I compiled the following list for documentary research. I want it to explore Tara and Parker county, Texas more because through writing the report, I actually figured out that Hickman Monro Schultz spent some specific time there from 1850 to 1870, and I’m missing him on 1860 census. And I think the census was lost in one of those counties, which is probably why I can’t find him anyway. There are other records that are X down for those years. And so I want to do some research in the land and tax records. And then I also want to return to Martin Schultz and look for him in the war of 1812.
Diana (27m 38s):
There is a service record attached to his profile and family search, but it’s for the Maryland militia, which I don’t believe he ever lived in Maryland. And I’m thinking it’s just for a man of the same name. And then I also want to look for some tax records to see when he moved from re county Tennessee to Alabama. And then there’s also an M Schultz who served in the Mexican war in Texas from 1845 to 46. And I’m wondering if this was Martin Schultz or again, another man of the same name, could he have died in the war? You know, he dies before 1850, so there’s still some research to be done there on Martin. And then I also want to more fully researched the siblings of Hickman, Monroe Schultz, and discover their migration patterns and proximity to Hickman in Texas.
Diana (28m 23s):
I have a little bit of that, but I want to dive in and, and really flesh that out for each one of those and Dan for the DNA research, I want to continue to identify and verify DNA matches to Lucretia through each of Hickman Monro Schultz as siblings. So I want to just really add to the body of evidence and continue to build out that descendency tree for Martin Schultz and Sarah ROWDONE. And then of course, once I have this generation proven, I want to go back and use DNA to prove Martin’s father as Ballantine Schultz, we always have more, we can do.
Nicole (28m 58s):
So how did you finish up the report as far as, you know, incorporating feedback and editing?
Diana (29m 4s):
So with the research report draft finished, the next step is doing the final edits and an aesthetic re group. We have peer review and we received good feedback on the writing. It’s so often the case that we don’t realize the holes that we have in our research and when someone else reads it, they can see that and tell us about it. And so I incorporated some of the feedback. One of my peer reviewers said she was expecting more on the DNA side of it. And, you know, through lines was pretty easy to write about, but I realized I could add a little bit more and beef that up. So we also think about in the study group and talk about what we’re going to do with our finished product.
Diana (29m 46s):
And I decided I wanted to eventually upload my report to the profile of Hickman Monro Schultz and tag Martin Schultz. So it will appear on both their pages. I also want to add sources to back up the written report that I will put up on the Schultz’s pages on family search, and because I’m respectful, the privacy of the DNA matches, you know, I will be uploading an anonymized version of the report and considering copyright issues for any of the images that I use in the report.
Nicole (30m 21s):
So after you finished your report, the last assignment for the study group is to think about further DNA education. So what did you think about for that?
Diana (30m 29s):
So for further DNA education, I am signed up for the advanced DNA evidence course by blame Benton jerk, which will be at the genealogical research Institute of Pittsburgh. And then I’m also going to finish watching the recordings from the east coast genetic genealogy conference. And so, you know, it’s always great to learn more. And then I also get to teach a four session course that Brigham young university is education. We can August on using DNA in genealogy research. So I’m excited to develop some material to help people get off on the right foot, you know, kind of looking at beginner level or, or people who’ve taken a test and don’t know what to do next.
Diana (31m 9s):
And it’s always really fun to teach. And of course you always learn as you teach.
Nicole (31m 14s):
Wonderful. Well, it’s so great that you got a chance to write all of this up. And if anybody listening wants to do a project like this, where you confer research that you’ve done in documentary records or work on a brick wall and apply DNA evidence, I hope you’ll join us in one of our study groups or even in our independent study courses. So the links to those are in the show notes, working through a project is such a wonderful way to feel like you made progress and actually completed something by writing a report. It’s such a good feeling to make progress in your genealogy research,
Diana (31m 48s):
Right? And you know, even if you just do a couple projects a year, like I do with the city group, though, there are two more projects that you have done and it’s so great to make progress and feel like you are moving those brick walls forward one little piece at a time.
Nicole (32m 5s):
Fantastic. All right, everyone have a great week and we’ll talk to you again next week. Bye.
Diana (32m 9s):
All right, bye. Bye everyone.
Nicole (32m 48s):
Thank you for listening. We hope that something you heard today will help you make progress in your research. If you want to learn more, purchase our books, Research Like a Pro and Research Like a Pro with DNA on Amazon.com and other booksellers. You can also register for our online courses or study groups of the same names. Learn more at FamilyLocket.com/services. To share your progress and ask questions, join our private Facebook group by sending us your book receipt or joining our courses to get updates in your email inbox each Monday, subscribe to our newsletter at FamilyLocket.com/newsletter. Please subscribe, rate and review our podcast. We read each review and are so thankful for them. We hope you’ll start now to Research Like a Pro.
Links
Proving a Parent-Child Link Using Ancestry DNA ThruLines and Documentary Research: Part 3
RLP 203: Proving a Parent-Child Link Using Ancestry Thrulines – Part 1
Research Like a Pro Resources
Research Like a Pro: A Genealogist’s Guide book by Diana Elder with Nicole Dyer on Amazon.com – https://amzn.to/2x0ku3d
Research Like a Pro eCourse – independent study course – https://familylocket.com/product/research-like-a-pro-e-course/
RLP Study Group – upcoming group and email notification list – https://familylocket.com/services/research-like-a-pro-study-group/
Research Like a Pro with DNA Resources
Research Like a Pro with DNA: A Genealogist’s Guide to Finding and Confirming Ancestors with DNA Evidence book by Diana Elder, Nicole Dyer, and Robin Wirthlin – https://amzn.to/3gn0hKx
Research Like a Pro with DNA eCourse – independent study course – https://familylocket.com/product/research-like-a-pro-with-dna-ecourse/
RLP with DNA Study Group – upcoming group and email notification list – https://familylocket.com/services/research-like-a-pro-with-dna-study-group/
Thank you
Thanks for listening! We hope that you will share your thoughts about our podcast and help us out by doing the following:
Share an honest review on iTunes or Stitcher. You can easily write a review with Stitcher, without creating an account. Just scroll to the bottom of the page and click “write a review.” You simply provide a nickname and an email address that will not be published. We value your feedback and your ratings really help this podcast reach others. If you leave a review, we will read it on the podcast and answer any questions that you bring up in your review. Thank you!
Leave a comment in the comment or question in the comment section below.
Share the episode on Twitter, Facebook, or Pinterest.
Subscribe on iTunes, Stitcher, Google Play, or your favorite podcast app.
Sign up for our newsletter to receive notifications of new episodes – https://familylocket.com/sign-up/
Check out this list of genealogy podcasts from Feedspot: Top 20 Genealogy Podcasts – https://blog.feedspot.com/genealogy_podcasts/
Leave a Reply
Thanks for the note!